← Back to Blog
NAPLAN Explained

The 10 NAPLAN Writing Criteria Explained (And How They're Scored)

2 April 20268 min read
Year 3Year 5Year 7Year 9

The NAPLAN writing task is marked by trained markers using a 10-criterion rubric worth 47 marks in total. Most students — and many parents — have no idea this rubric exists. Understanding it changes how you practise.

Below is a plain-English breakdown of all 10 criteria: what they measure, how many marks they're worth, and what separates a high score from a low one.

1. Audience (up to 6 marks)

This is the highest-value single criterion and often the hardest to explain. Audience measures whether the writing consistently addresses and engages its intended reader — not whether it's technically correct.

A Band 4 piece might be grammatically fine but feel like it was written for no one in particular. A Band 8+ piece makes the reader feel spoken to directly — through tone, word choice, and the writer's clear sense of purpose.

💡

Audience is often the first criterion markers notice and the last they forget. A strong opening that establishes voice and purpose early sets the tone for the entire piece.

2. Text Structure (up to 4 marks)

Does the piece have a recognisable beginning, middle and end — appropriate to the genre? For persuasive writing, that means a clear introduction with a stated position, body paragraphs with arguments, and a conclusion. For narrative, an orientation, complication and resolution.

Marks are awarded for how well the structure is sustained throughout. A piece that starts with a strong introduction but then meanders scores lower than one with a simpler structure that's maintained consistently.

3. Ideas (up to 5 marks)

Ideas assesses the quality and development of the content — not just whether the student has a point of view, but whether they elaborate, explain and support it. Generic ideas ("it's good for your health", "it's fun") score lower than specific, detailed development.

Higher-band Ideas scores come from writing that goes beyond the obvious — offering an unexpected perspective, an illustrative example, or a nuanced acknowledgement of complexity.

4. Persuasive Devices (up to 5 marks) — Persuasive genre only

This criterion only applies to persuasive writing tasks. It assesses the deliberate use of rhetorical techniques: rhetorical questions, repetition, inclusive language ("we", "us"), statistics or evidence, emotive language, and calls to action.

The marker is looking for intentional technique — not accidental persuasion. A student who uses a rhetorical question mid-argument scores higher than one who accidentally uses persuasive language without apparent awareness.

5. Vocabulary (up to 5 marks)

Vocabulary is not simply about using "big words". Markers reward precision, variety, and appropriateness. A student who consistently chooses the exact right word for the context — even a simple one — scores better than one who sprinkles in impressive vocabulary awkwardly.

The clearest vocabulary gains come from replacing vague words ("good", "bad", "nice", "thing") with specific ones. "Compelling argument" instead of "good point". "Deteriorated" instead of "got worse".

6. Cohesion (up to 4 marks)

Cohesion measures how smoothly the writing flows from sentence to sentence and paragraph to paragraph. This includes use of connective words and phrases (however, consequently, in addition), consistent pronoun reference, and logical sequencing of ideas.

A common cohesion error: switching from "they" to "the government" to "politicians" mid-piece without clear reason, creating a choppy, disconnected effect.

7. Paragraphing (up to 2 marks)

This is the simplest criterion to improve: use paragraphs, and use them correctly. Marks are awarded for paragraphing that groups related ideas together. Two marks are achievable by consistently starting new paragraphs for new ideas and not running everything into one block of text.

8. Sentence Structure (up to 6 marks)

Equal in value to Audience, Sentence Structure assesses the range and control of sentence constructions. Higher-band writing uses varied sentence length (short for emphasis, longer for elaboration), correctly formed complex sentences, and deliberate stylistic choices.

Common deductions: run-on sentences, sentence fragments, tense inconsistency, and unresolved edits left in the text.

9. Punctuation (up to 5 marks)

Punctuation is assessed on accuracy and range. Using only full stops and commas scores lower than demonstrating control of apostrophes, colons, semicolons, dashes, and quotation marks — even if used sparingly.

10. Spelling (up to 5 marks)

Full marks in Spelling require accurate spelling across a wide range of words including irregular ones. Importantly, NAPLAN markers also consider the ambition of the student's vocabulary when assessing spelling — attempting more complex words and spelling them correctly is rewarded over playing safe with simple words.

Which Criteria Matter Most?

CriterionMax MarksRelative Impact
Audience6Very high — signals writing maturity
Sentence Structure6Very high — errors are immediately visible
Ideas5High — differentiates Band 6 from Band 7+
Persuasive Devices5High — easy wins with deliberate technique
Vocabulary5High — accessible improvement with practice
Punctuation5Medium — reduces below Band 6 if weak
Spelling5Medium — rarely limits band alone
Text Structure4Medium — foundational, easy to get right
Cohesion4Medium — often overlooked in practice
Paragraphing2Low marks but fully controllable

The fastest band improvements typically come from: shoring up Sentence Structure errors (which are visible and mechanical), adding deliberate Persuasive Devices, and improving Vocabulary precision. Audience improvements come more slowly but have the highest ceiling.

BandUp scores every essay against all 10 criteria and flags your child's three weakest areas immediately.

Start free — 3 essays included →
Written by the BandUp team · Updated 2 April 2026
← More articles